Race and Social Problems

391 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 391 papers published in Race and Social Problems in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Race and Social Problems usually cover Sociology and Political Science (302 papers), Clinical Psychology (79 papers) and General Health Professions (72 papers) specifically the topics of Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (127 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (72 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Race and Social Problems are Douglas S. Massey, Richard Rothstein, Dawne M. Mouzon, Edward Telles, Igor Ryabov, Ann Marie Deer Owens, Amanda Toler Woodward, David R. Williams, Eileen Díaz McConnell and Sarah Burgard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Race and Social Problems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Race and Social Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Race and Social Problems.

Countries where authors publish in Race and Social Problems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Race and Social Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Race and Social Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Race and Social Problems more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025