Emily M. Douglas
- Health top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Gender Studies top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Co-authors
- Murray A. StrausDenise A. HinesAlexandra LysovaWilliam L. CookLouise DixonAndréia MachadoElizabeth BatesDavid Finkelhor
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (38 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (38 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (27 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandCanada
In The Last Decade
Emily M. Douglas
76 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Health 1.7k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
- Gender Studies 802
- General Health Professions 624
Countries citing papers authored by Emily M. Douglas
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily M. Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily M. Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily M. Douglas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily M. Douglas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily M. Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily M. Douglas. The network helps show where Emily M. Douglas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily M. Douglas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily M. Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily M. Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily M. Douglas. Emily M. Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | Child Maltreatment Fatalities: A Report from the 2010-11 Bridgewater Presidential Fellow | 1 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 172 | |
| 14 | 79 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 123 | |
| 17 | 98 | |
| 18 | Corporal Punishment and the Case for Policy Action | 0 |
| 19 | Mending broken families : social policies for divorced families : how effective are they? | 5 |
| 20 | 50 |
About Emily M. Douglas
Emily M. Douglas is a scholar working on Health, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (38 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (38 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.7k citations), Gender Studies (802 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations). Emily M. Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Murray A. Straus, Denise A. Hines, Denise A. Hines, Alexandra Lysova, William L. Cook, Louise Dixon, Andréia Machado, Elizabeth Bates, David Finkelhor and Rose Anne Medeiros. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.