Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

6.5k citations
543 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

511 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
  • Occupational Therapy 670
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 199
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 656
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.3k
  • General Health Professions 1.6k
Replace Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology with:
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology Germany
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health United States
Medycyna Pracy Poland
JBI Evidence Synthesis Australia
˜La œMedicina del lavoro Italy
Asian Nursing Research South Korea
Journal of physiotherapy Australia
Perspectives in Public Health United Kingdom
International Journal of Workplace Health Management United Kingdom
Occupational Therapy International United States
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine relative to Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology Germany Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

About Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

The 543 papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine usually cover Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (65 papers), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (124 papers), Occupational Therapy (36 papers), Chemical Health and Safety (5 papers) and Medical Laboratory Technology (11 papers) specifically the topics of Workplace Health and Well-being (137 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (88 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (73 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (59 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (56 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (56 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (49 papers) and Occupational Health and Performance (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine are Rob Marc Orr, Hwan‐Cheol Kim, Tae Won Jang, Kyoung‐Bok Min, Hyoung‐Ryoul Kim, Man Joong Jeon, Rodney Pope, Se-Yeong Kim, Dae Ryong Kang and Eun‐A Kim.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact