Jim Psaros

790 total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 596 citations indexed

About

Jim Psaros is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Jim Psaros has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 596 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Accounting, 6 papers in Management Information Systems and 5 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Jim Psaros's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers). Jim Psaros is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (7 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers). Jim Psaros collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Jim Psaros's co-authors include Bobae Choi, Doowon Lee, Ken T. Trotman, Chris Patel, Maria Krambia‐Kapardis, Scott Holmes, Geoffrey Smith, Erica French, Leigh Wood and Jennifer W. M. Lai and has published in prestigious journals such as Corporate Governance An International Review, The British Accounting Review and Accounting and Finance.

In The Last Decade

Jim Psaros

17 papers receiving 529 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

An analysis of Australian company carbon emission disclosures

2013 348 citations Bobae Choi, Doowon Lee et al. Pacific Accounting Review profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jim Psaros Australia	8	350	294	151	78	64	18	596
M. Akhtaruddin Bangladesh	8	532 1.5×	744 2.5×	112 0.7×	52 0.7×	32 0.5×	12	913
Silvia Solimene Italy	10	374 1.1×	164 0.6×	207 1.4×	126 1.6×	30 0.5×	24	558
Badingatus Solikhah Indonesia	14	370 1.1×	317 1.1×	99 0.7×	64 0.8×	30 0.5×	54	570
Martin Stawinoga Germany	6	585 1.7×	325 1.1×	314 2.1×	91 1.2×	18 0.3×	17	725
Etty Murwaningsari Indonesia	13	351 1.0×	319 1.1×	60 0.4×	60 0.8×	26 0.4×	134	567
Fereshteh Mahmoudian Canada	10	495 1.4×	186 0.6×	348 2.3×	63 0.8×	22 0.3×	17	654
Jong‐Seo Choi South Korea	8	398 1.1×	277 0.9×	248 1.6×	40 0.5×	14 0.2×	37	535
Alessandra Allini Italy	14	411 1.2×	437 1.5×	187 1.2×	93 1.2×	25 0.4×	40	694
Carlos Noronha Macao	12	374 1.1×	183 0.6×	165 1.1×	60 0.8×	27 0.4×	32	536
Muttanachai Suttipun Thailand	17	468 1.3×	304 1.0×	244 1.6×	86 1.1×	17 0.3×	61	698

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Psaros

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Psaros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Psaros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Psaros more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Psaros

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Psaros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Psaros. The network helps show where Jim Psaros may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jim Psaros

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jim Psaros. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jim Psaros based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jim Psaros. Jim Psaros is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Docherty, Paul, et al.. (2018). Internal Governance Does Matter to Equity Returns but Much More So During “Flights to Quality”. Journal of applied corporate finance. 30(1). 39–52. 1 indexed citations

Psaros, Jim, et al.. (2017). The Relevance of Western Corporate Governance in Mitigating Management Misconduct in Thailand. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. 54(6). 1425–1441. 11 indexed citations

Wood, Leigh, Jim Psaros, Erica French, & Jennifer W. M. Lai. (2015). Learning experiences for the transition to professional work. Cogent Business & Management. 2(1). 7 indexed citations

Psaros, Jim, et al.. (2015). Ranking Corporate Governance of Australia's Top Companies: A Decade On. Australian Accounting Review. 25(4). 405–412. 3 indexed citations

Choi, Bobae, Doowon Lee, & Jim Psaros. (2013). An analysis of Australian company carbon emission disclosures. Pacific Accounting Review. 25(1). 58–79. 348 indexed citations breakdown →

Psaros, Jim. (2007). Do principles‐based accounting standards lead to biased financial reporting? An Australian experiment. Accounting and Finance. 47(3). 527–550. 26 indexed citations

Krambia‐Kapardis, Maria, Jim Psaros, & Jill Atkins. (2007). Corporate governance: Rating of the EU member states guidelines. Corporate Ownership and Control. 4(3). 160–172. 1 indexed citations

Krambia‐Kapardis, Maria & Jim Psaros. (2006). The Implementation of Corporate Governance Principles in an Emerging Economy: a critique of the situation in Cyprus. Corporate Governance An International Review. 14(2). 126–139. 40 indexed citations

Psaros, Jim & Ken T. Trotman. (2004). The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Preparers' Judgments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 8 indexed citations

10.

Psaros, Jim & Ken T. Trotman. (2004). The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Judgments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

11.

Psaros, Jim & Ken T. Trotman. (2004). The Impact of the Type of Accounting Standards on Preparers’ Judgments. Abacus. 40(1). 76–93. 67 indexed citations

12.

Psaros, Jim & Scott Holmes. (2004). The questionable value of the going concern assumption to unsecured creditors : a case study of mine closure. 17(1). 24–31. 1 indexed citations

13.

Psaros, Jim, et al.. (2004). Australian Audit Committees — Do They Meet Best Practice Guidelines?. Australian Accounting Review. 14(34). 77–85. 16 indexed citations

14.

Psaros, Jim, et al.. (2003). A Study of Uncertainty Expressions in Australian Accounting and Auditing Standards. Pacific Accounting Review. 15(2). 1–28. 7 indexed citations

15.

Patel, Chris & Jim Psaros. (2000). PERCEPTIONS OF EXTERNAL AUDITORS’ INDEPENDENCE: SOME CROSS-CULTURAL EVIDENCE. The British Accounting Review. 32(3). 311–338. 50 indexed citations

16.

Smith, Geoffrey, Jim Psaros, & Scott Holmes. (1999). A Research Note on the Use and Perceived Usefulness of Analytical Procedures by Australian Auditors. Australian Accounting Review. 9(18). 64–72. 5 indexed citations

17.

Psaros, Jim, et al.. (1996). A Study of Accountants' Judgments With Respect to the Provision of Consolidated Financial Statements. Abacus. 32(1). 62–80. 3 indexed citations

18.

Oliver, Barry & Jim Psaros. (1985). Audit reports: Does AUP3 provide adequate guidance?. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 56(8). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact