Ore Geology Reviews

5.7k papers and 138.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.7k papers published in Ore Geology Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 138.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Ore Geology Reviews usually cover Geophysics (4.9k papers), Artificial Intelligence (3.9k papers) and Geochemistry and Petrology (1.4k papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (4.8k papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3.9k papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (2.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ore Geology Reviews are David I. Groves, Franco Pirajno, Jeremy P. Richards, Emmanuel John M. Carranza, T. Campbell McCuaig, Richard J. Goldfarb, M. Santosh, Jingwen Mao, Gavin M. Mudd and Peter Laznicka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ore Geology Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ore Geology Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ore Geology Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Ore Geology Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ore Geology Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ore Geology Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ore Geology Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025