Medical Engineering & Physics

4.1k papers and 101.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.1k papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics in the last decades have received a total of 101.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.6k papers), Surgery (1.5k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (583 papers) specifically the topics of Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (558 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (484 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (350 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Engineering & Physics are Peter Zioupos, Liisa T. Kuhn, Jae‐Young Rho, Joyce H. Keyak, Amit Gefen, Ming Zhang, Marco Viceconti, Steven K. Boyd, G.M. Lyons and Sheng Quan Xie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Engineering & Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Engineering & Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Engineering & Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Engineering & Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025