Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
About
In The Last Decade
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
7.2k papers receiving 146.2k citations
Fields of papers published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Countries where authors publish in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology more than expected).
- Cutaneous manifestations in COVID‐19: a first perspective (2020)
- European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (2015)
- Pyoderma gangrenosum: an updated review (2009)
- 2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis (2014)
- 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis (2020)
- Clinical and pathological characteristics of extradigital and digital glomus tumours: a retrospective comparative study (2011)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.