Current Diabetes Reviews

1.3k papers and 25.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 25.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (662 papers), Surgery (236 papers) and Physiology (215 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Management and Research (218 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (168 papers) and Pancreatic Islet Dysfunction and Regeneration (159 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Diabetes Reviews are Afiat Berbudi, Zhuo Fu, Dongmin Liu, Elizabeth R. Gilbert, Sherita Hill Golden, Rovina Ruslami, Adi Imam Tjahjadi, Günter Wolf, Fuad N. Ziyadeh and Asirvatham Alwin Robert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Current Diabetes Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Diabetes Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Diabetes Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Diabetes Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025