Countries where authors publish in Southeastern Europe
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Southeastern Europe. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Southeastern Europe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southeastern Europe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Southeastern Europe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Southeastern Europe.
About Southeastern Europe
The 216 papers published in Southeastern Europe in the last decades have received a total of 679 indexed citations . Papers published in Southeastern Europe usually cover Cultural Studies (60 papers), Political Science and International Relations (85 papers), Development (7 papers), Sociology and Political Science (71 papers) and Anthropology (10 papers) specifically the topics of Balkans: History, Politics, Society (59 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (31 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (21 papers), Turkey's Politics and Society (13 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (13 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (13 papers), European Politics and Security (12 papers) and European and International Law Studies (12 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Southeastern Europe are Soeren Keil, Florian Bieber, Ayhan Kaya, Jelena Džankić, Jelena Subotić, Roman Kuhar, Will Bartlett, Ana Hofman, S. Barbieri and Dimitris Skleparis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.