Countries where authors publish in Research and Reports in Urology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and Reports in Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and Reports in Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and Reports in Urology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Research and Reports in Urology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and Reports in Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and Reports in Urology.
About Research and Reports in Urology
The 529 papers published in Research and Reports in Urology in the last decades have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Research and Reports in Urology usually cover Urology (221 papers), Rheumatology (139 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (210 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (140 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (106 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (86 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (83 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (65 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (65 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (64 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (59 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and Reports in Urology are Glenn T. Werneburg, Raouf Seyam, Gianni Paulis, Sidney B. Radomski, Renu Eapen, Johny E. Elkahwaji, Hussein E. Al‐Hazmi, Emilio Sacco, Kurt G. Naber and Nikhil Vasdev.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.