Minerva Urology and Nephrology

483 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 483 papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (306 papers), Surgery (167 papers) and Urology (139 papers) specifically the topics of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (121 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (90 papers) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Minerva Urology and Nephrology are Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Cosimo De Nunzio, Andrea Tubaro, Riccardo Autorino, Daniele Amparore, Enrico Checcucci, F. Porpiglia, Riccardo Bertolo and Luca Cindolo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology.

Countries where authors publish in Minerva Urology and Nephrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Minerva Urology and Nephrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minerva Urology and Nephrology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025