Countries where authors publish in Current Urology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Urology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Urology.
About Current Urology
The 646 papers published in Current Urology in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Current Urology usually cover Urology (193 papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (297 papers) and Rheumatology (134 papers) specifically the topics of Urological Disorders and Treatments (117 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (105 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (102 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (98 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (81 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (77 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (76 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (75 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Urology are Nikhil Vasdev, Heba M. Adly, Anmar Nassir, Saleh A. K. Saleh, Hodo Haxhimolla, Hideaki Miyake, Adi Y. Weintraub, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Elad Leron and Masato Fujisawa.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.