Therapeutic Advances in Urology

557 papers and 8.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 557 papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (251 papers), Urology (218 papers) and Surgery (191 papers) specifically the topics of Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (156 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (105 papers) and Pelvic Floor Disorders (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Therapeutic Advances in Urology are Frank Burks, Karl‐Erik Andersson, Chris G. McMahon, William J. Catàlona, Stacy Loeb, Bhaskar Somani, Richard A. Santucci, Ekaterina Kulchavenya, Theo M. de Reijke and Fred Saad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology.

Countries where authors publish in Therapeutic Advances in Urology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Therapeutic Advances in Urology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Therapeutic Advances in Urology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025