The 5.4k papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy in the last decades have received a total of 68.9k indexed citations.
Papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy usually cover Aerospace Engineering (3.2k papers), Materials Chemistry (2.6k papers) and Radiation (796 papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (2.7k papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (1.7k papers) and Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Progress in Nuclear Energy are Suizheng Qiu, Wenxi Tian, Jianlong Wang, Kord Smith, G.H. Su, Kais Saidi, Rodney C. Ewing, R.D. Lawrence, M.I. Sayyed and Takashi Hibiki.
Citations per field, relative to Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy · 1×
×1.133.2kMC
×1.130.4kAE
×0.911.5kME
×0.87.5kCM
×0.65.0kBE
Citations per year, relative to Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Progress in Nuclear Energy
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Progress in Nuclear Energy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Progress in Nuclear Energy more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy
This network shows the impact of papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Progress in Nuclear Energy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.