Applied Radiation and Isotopes

10.4k papers and 130.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.4k papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes in the last decades have received a total of 130.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes usually cover Radiation (5.6k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.9k papers) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (2.6k papers) specifically the topics of Nuclear Physics and Applications (3.4k papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (2.6k papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Radiation and Isotopes are S.M. Qaim, David Taylor, Atef El‐Taher, Karsten Kossert, D.A. Bradley, O. Sima, Heinz H. Coenen, Xiangke Wang, Ayben Kilislioğlu and S. Pommé.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Radiation and Isotopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Radiation and Isotopes more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025