Neurology and Therapy

616 papers and 7.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 616 papers published in Neurology and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 7.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Neurology and Therapy usually cover Pathology and Forensic Medicine (194 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (190 papers) and Neurology (187 papers) specifically the topics of Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (157 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (64 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurology and Therapy are Kaj Blennow, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Quanwu Zhang, Mark Rametta, Anthony T. Reder, Michael Byrnes, Leigh Ann White, Masahisa Katsuno, Haruki Koike and Mortimer Mamelak.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neurology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurology and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurology and Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Neurology and Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurology and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurology and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurology and Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025