Edinburgh Journal of Botany

799 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 799 papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (612 papers), Plant Science (455 papers) and Molecular Biology (373 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Diversity and Evolution (433 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (330 papers) and Plant and animal studies (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Edinburgh Journal of Botany are J. A. Ratter, Samuel Bridgewater, Ary Teixeira de Oliveira‐Filho, Darién E. Prado, J. F. Ribeiro, B. L. Burtt, David J. Middleton, Robert B. Atkinson, Mark F. Newman and David G. Long.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany.

Countries where authors publish in Edinburgh Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Edinburgh Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edinburgh Journal of Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025