Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi

514 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 514 papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi usually cover Plant Science (131 papers), Ecology (73 papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (54 papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Conservation Studies (42 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (28 papers) and Forest ecology and management (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi are Tatuo Kira, Kyoji Yoda, Kazuo Hozumi, Kichiro Shinozaki, Tohru Nakashizuka, Tsunahide Shidei, Makoto Numata, Kaneyuki Nakane, Tsuyoshi Yoneda and Yasuro Kadono.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi.

Countries where authors publish in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nihon Seitai Gakkaishi more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025