Nature and Science of Sleep

943 papers and 14.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 943 papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep in the last decades have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep usually cover Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (555 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (457 papers) and Physiology (367 papers) specifically the topics of Sleep and related disorders (520 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (438 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (331 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature and Science of Sleep are M. Hemels, Goran Medić, Shelley Hershner, Reut Gruber, Angelika Schlarb, Jeanne F. Duffy, Tamar Shochat, David Gozal, Kai Spiegelhalder and Vladyslav V. Vyazovskiy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep.

Countries where authors publish in Nature and Science of Sleep

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature and Science of Sleep. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature and Science of Sleep with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature and Science of Sleep more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025