This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Aging more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Aging.
About Nature Aging
The 551 papers published in Nature Aging in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Nature Aging usually cover Aging (102 papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (29 papers), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 papers), Neurology (55 papers) and Physiology (167 papers) specifically the topics of Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (102 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (60 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (49 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (44 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (43 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (35 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (30 papers) and Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Aging are Linda Partridge, Dudley W. Lamming, George A. Kuchel, James L. Kirkland, Nathan Gasek, Ming Xu, Joan B. Mannick, Diego De Leo, Oskar Hansson and Anna Katharina Simon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.