Countries where authors publish in IET Nanobiotechnology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IET Nanobiotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IET Nanobiotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology.
About IET Nanobiotechnology
The 1.0k papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 18.7k indexed citations . Papers published in IET Nanobiotechnology usually cover Biomaterials (203 papers), Materials Chemistry (491 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (369 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (392 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (120 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (119 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (75 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (59 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (55 papers), Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis (53 papers) and Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (45 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IET Nanobiotechnology are Mahendra Rai, Muhammad Zia, Mehrdad Khatami, Sania Naz, Jie Wu, Sanchaita Lala, Samad Mussa Farkhani, Alireza Valizadeh, P. Senthil Kumar and Aniket Gade.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.