Nanotechnology Reviews

1.1k papers and 21.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 21.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews usually cover Materials Chemistry (438 papers), Biomedical Engineering (366 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (158 papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (92 papers), Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer (75 papers) and Concrete and Cement Materials Research (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nanotechnology Reviews are David Hui, Rongchao Jin, Agbaje Lateef, Isiaka Adedayo Adelere, Michael R. Hamblin, Wenguang Yang, Shuxiang Cai, Haibo Yu, Ke Xu and Parham Sahandi Zangabad.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Nanotechnology Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanotechnology Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanotechnology Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanotechnology Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025