This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Magallania. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Magallania with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magallania more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Magallania. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Magallania.
About Magallania
The 507 papers published in Magallania in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Magallania usually cover Anthropology (218 papers), Paleontology (132 papers), Archeology (172 papers), Cultural Studies (69 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (60 papers) specifically the topics of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (167 papers), Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond (116 papers), Archaeological and Geological Studies (113 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (103 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (61 papers), Cultural and Social Studies in Latin America (57 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (55 papers) and Migration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Magallania are César Méndez, Luis Alberto Borrero, Jimena Torres, Manuel San Román, Fabiana Martin, Flavia Morello, Ricardo Aníbal Guichón, Alfredo Prieto, Augusto Tessone and Judith Charlin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.