Southeastern Archaeology

473 papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 473 papers published in Southeastern Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Southeastern Archaeology usually cover Anthropology (331 papers), Paleontology (301 papers) and Archeology (67 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (301 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (193 papers) and Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Southeastern Archaeology are Victor D. Thompson, Thomas E. Emerson, R. Berle Clay, Timothy K. Perttula, Matthew C. Sanger, Christopher B. Rodning, William H. Marquardt, Amber M. VanDerwarker, Gregory A. Waselkov and Marvin T. Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Southeastern Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Southeastern Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Southeastern Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Southeastern Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Southeastern Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Southeastern Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Southeastern Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025