The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology · 1×
×1.35k/4kPALEO
×1.13k/2kARCHE
×1.13k/2kANTHR
×0.92k/2kECOLO
×1.22k/1kAS
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Environmental Archaeology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Environmental Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Environmental Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Environmental Archaeology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Environmental Archaeology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Environmental Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Environmental Archaeology.
About Environmental Archaeology
The 750 papers published in Environmental Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 8.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Environmental Archaeology usually cover Paleontology (467 papers), Archeology (233 papers) and Anthropology (216 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (460 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (171 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (152 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Environmental Archaeology are Michael Charles, Phil Austin, Eleni Asouti, Dorian Q. Fuller, Stefanie Jacomet, Sabine Karg, Ingrid Mainland, Chris J. Stevens, Alan K. Outram and Jörg Schibler.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.