Countries where authors publish in LCGC North America
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in LCGC North America. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in LCGC North America with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LCGC North America more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in LCGC North America. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in LCGC North America.
About LCGC North America
The 251 papers published in LCGC North America in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Papers published in LCGC North America usually cover Spectroscopy (151 papers), Analytical Chemistry (65 papers), Biomedical Engineering (77 papers), Food Science (26 papers) and Molecular Biology (69 papers) specifically the topics of Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (133 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (37 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (37 papers), Protein purification and stability (31 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (30 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (25 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (25 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in LCGC North America are Ronald E. Majors, Dietrich A. Volmer, Michael E. Swartz, John W. Dolan, Nicholas H. Snow, Dwight R. Stoll, Steven J. Lehotay, Michael W. Dong, David S. Bell and Joseph J. Pesek.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.