Countries where authors publish in Biospectroscopy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biospectroscopy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biospectroscopy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biospectroscopy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biospectroscopy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biospectroscopy.
About Biospectroscopy
The 238 papers published in Biospectroscopy in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Biospectroscopy usually cover Biophysics (64 papers), Analytical Chemistry (27 papers), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (23 papers), Spectroscopy (40 papers) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 papers) specifically the topics of Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (52 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (32 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (30 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (27 papers), Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis (25 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (25 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (21 papers) and Hemoglobin structure and function (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biospectroscopy are Giulietta Smulevich, Timothy A. Keiderling, Max Diem, Michel Daudon, Laurence Estepa, Bayden R. Wood, Michael Quinn, Henry H. Mantsch, G.J. Puppels and Rolf Wolthuis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.