Current Swedish Archaeology

290 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 290 papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology usually cover History (107 papers), Paleontology (103 papers) and Archeology (89 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Archaeological Studies (105 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (103 papers) and Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Swedish Archaeology are Kristian Kristiansen, Bjørnar Olsen, Alexandra Ion, Torun Zachrisson, Fredrik Fahlander, Kristina Jennbert, Gavin Lucas, Liv Nilsson Stutz, Martin Furholt and Anders Högberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Swedish Archaeology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Swedish Archaeology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Swedish Archaeology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Swedish Archaeology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025