Journal for Healthcare Quality

1.5k papers and 17.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality in the last decades have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality usually cover General Health Professions (514 papers), Economics and Econometrics (272 papers) and Emergency Medical Services (198 papers) specifically the topics of Healthcare Policy and Management (190 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (183 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (155 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal for Healthcare Quality are Stephen Rollnick, William J. Miller, Kathleen N Lohr, Ann C. Greiner, Elisa Knebel, Lu Ann Aday, Peter C. Block, Thomas L. Delbanco, Susan Edgman‐Levitan and Margaret Gerteis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality.

Countries where authors publish in Journal for Healthcare Quality

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for Healthcare Quality. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for Healthcare Quality with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for Healthcare Quality more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025