CR The New Centennial Review

504 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 504 papers published in CR The New Centennial Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in CR The New Centennial Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (213 papers), Philosophy (136 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (119 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (68 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (47 papers) and Latin American Literature Studies (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CR The New Centennial Review are Sylvia Wynter, Kodwo Eshun, Saskia Sassen, Linda Martín Alcoff, David Marriott, Calvin Warren, Nicholas De Genova, Jean‐Luc Nancy, Joël Beinin and David L. Clark.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in CR The New Centennial Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CR The New Centennial Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CR The New Centennial Review.

Countries where authors publish in CR The New Centennial Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CR The New Centennial Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CR The New Centennial Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CR The New Centennial Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025