Physiological Entomology

2.3k papers and 53.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Physiological Entomology in the last decades have received a total of 53.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Physiological Entomology usually cover Insect Science (1.4k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k papers) and Genetics (920 papers) specifically the topics of Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (882 papers), Plant and animal studies (716 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (652 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physiological Entomology are Stephen J. Simpson, John Kennedy, Thomas C. Baker, David L. Denlinger, D.S. Saunders, Ring T. Cardé, Jim Hardie, Michael T. Siva‐Jothy, Elizabeth A. Bernays and Gabriella Gibson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physiological Entomology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physiological Entomology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physiological Entomology.

Countries where authors publish in Physiological Entomology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physiological Entomology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physiological Entomology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiological Entomology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025