Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

839 papers and 14.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 839 papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation in the last decades have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation usually cover Surgery (367 papers), Molecular Biology (214 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (181 papers) specifically the topics of Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (134 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (97 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation are Ling Qin, Gang Li, Tingting Tang, Xinluan Wang, Wenjun Yang, Ping Hu, Wayne Lee, Stuart B. Goodman, Yì Wáng and Liangliang Xu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Orthopaedic Translation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Orthopaedic Translation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025