Review of Financial Economics

631 papers and 11.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 631 papers published in Review of Financial Economics in the last decades have received a total of 11.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Financial Economics usually cover Finance (468 papers), Accounting (327 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (322 papers) specifically the topics of Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (263 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (236 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Financial Economics are Diane K. Denis, David A. Sauer, Yousif Khalifa Al‐Yousif, Rima Turk Ariss, Laarni T. Bulan, Gregor Dorfleitner, Farooq Malik, Matthew Hood, Κωνσταντίνος Δράκος and Mahmoud Sami Nabi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Financial Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Financial Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Financial Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Financial Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Financial Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Financial Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025