Global Health Action

2.0k papers and 41.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Global Health Action in the last decades have received a total of 41.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Health Action usually cover General Health Professions (737 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (689 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (388 papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (646 papers), Financing of Health Care Systems and Universal Coverage (256 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (236 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Health Action are Tord Kjellström, Peter Byass, Ingvar Holmér, Bruno Lemke, Stig Wall, Malin Eriksson, S. V. Subramanian, Joacim Rocklöv, Mark Collinson and Laetitia C. Rispel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Health Action

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Health Action. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Health Action.

Countries where authors publish in Global Health Action

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Health Action. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Health Action with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Health Action more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025