Della Freeth

7.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
50 papers, 4.7k citations indexed

About

Della Freeth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Della Freeth has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 4.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Della Freeth's work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (28 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). Della Freeth is often cited by papers focused on Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (28 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). Della Freeth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Della Freeth's co-authors include Scott Reeves, Marilyn Hammick, Hugh Barr, Ivan Koppel, Merrick Zwarenstein, Joanne Goldman, Laure Perrier, Stephen Abbott, Maggie Nicol and Emma‐Jane Berridge and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medical Education and American Journal of Clinical Pathology.

In The Last Decade

Della Freeth

49 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Interprofessional education: effects on professional prac... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2013 2007 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Della Freeth United Kingdom 24 3.8k 2.5k 497 391 386 50 4.7k
Marilyn Hammick United Kingdom 27 3.0k 0.8× 2.0k 0.8× 502 1.0× 272 0.7× 373 1.0× 57 3.8k
Joanne Goldman Canada 23 3.3k 0.9× 2.0k 0.8× 286 0.6× 350 0.9× 172 0.4× 56 4.3k
Jill Thistlethwaite Australia 31 2.5k 0.7× 2.5k 1.0× 810 1.6× 314 0.8× 135 0.3× 149 4.3k
Ivan Koppel United Kingdom 13 2.2k 0.6× 1.4k 0.6× 296 0.6× 198 0.5× 279 0.7× 16 2.5k
Danielle D’Amour Canada 21 2.8k 0.7× 1.1k 0.4× 279 0.6× 333 0.9× 174 0.5× 41 3.6k
Ivy Oandasan Canada 22 2.2k 0.6× 1.4k 0.6× 252 0.5× 301 0.8× 180 0.5× 74 2.6k
Marie‐Dominique Beaulieu Canada 27 2.4k 0.6× 897 0.4× 176 0.4× 210 0.5× 107 0.3× 80 3.5k
Carole Orchard Canada 20 1.8k 0.5× 919 0.4× 207 0.4× 197 0.5× 155 0.4× 52 2.3k
Angie Titchen United Kingdom 25 3.2k 0.8× 1.0k 0.4× 372 0.7× 167 0.4× 61 0.2× 65 4.5k
Judith Lathlean United Kingdom 30 1.6k 0.4× 671 0.3× 545 1.1× 212 0.5× 96 0.2× 86 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Della Freeth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Della Freeth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Della Freeth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Della Freeth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Della Freeth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Della Freeth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Della Freeth. The network helps show where Della Freeth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Della Freeth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Della Freeth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Della Freeth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Della Freeth. Della Freeth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Stephens, Tim, et al.. (2016). An interprofessional training course in crises and human factors for perioperative teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 30(5). 685–688. 16 indexed citations
4.
Freeth, Della, Jane Sandall, T F Allan, et al.. (2012). A methodological study to compare survey-based and observation-based evaluations of organisational and safety cultures and then compare both approaches with markers of the quality of care.. Health Technology Assessment. 16(25). iii–iv, 1. 14 indexed citations
5.
Melton, Jane, Kirsty Forsyth, & Della Freeth. (2011). The Individual Practice Development Theory: an individually focused practice development theory that helps target practice development resources. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 18(3). 542–546. 11 indexed citations
6.
Reeves, Scott, Merrick Zwarenstein, Joanne Goldman, et al.. (2010). The effectiveness of interprofessional education: Key findings from a new systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 24(3). 230–241. 277 indexed citations
7.
Mackintosh, Nicola, Emma‐Jane Berridge, & Della Freeth. (2009). Supporting structures for team situation awareness and decision making: insights from four delivery suites. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 15(1). 46–54. 47 indexed citations
8.
Freeth, Della, et al.. (2006). MOSES: Multidisciplinary obstetric simulated emergency scenarios. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 20(5). 552–554. 12 indexed citations
9.
Reeves, Scott & Della Freeth. (2006). Re‐examining the evaluation of interprofessional education for community mental health teams with a different lens: understanding presage, process and product factors. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 13(6). 765–770. 38 indexed citations
10.
Freeth, Della. (2005). Development, delivery and evaluation. Blackwell eBooks. 2 indexed citations
11.
Freeth, Della, Marilyn Hammick, Scott Reeves, Ivan Koppel, & Hugh Barr. (2005). Effective interprofessional education : development, delivery and evaluation. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 244 indexed citations
12.
Freeth, Della & Scott Reeves. (2003). Learning to work together: using the presage, process, product (3P) model to highlight decisions and possibilities. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 18(1). 43–56. 142 indexed citations
13.
Reeves, Scott & Della Freeth. (2002). The London training ward: an innovative interprofessional learning initiative. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 16(1). 41–52. 139 indexed citations
14.
Reeves, Scott, Ivan Koppel, Hugh Barr, Della Freeth, & Marilyn Hammick. (2002). Twelve tips for undertaking a systematic review. Medical Teacher. 24(4). 358–363. 42 indexed citations
15.
Koppel, Ivan, Hugh Barr, Scott Reeves, Della Freeth, & Marilyn Hammick. (2001). Establishing a systematic approach to evaluating the effectiveness of interprofessional education. Research Repository (Kingston University London). 18 indexed citations
16.
Koppel, Ivan, Hugh Barr, Scott Reeves, Della Freeth, & Marilyn Hammick. (2001). Establishing a systematic approach to evaluating the effectiveness of interprofessional education Issues in Interdisciplinary Care. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 65(5). 601–11. 12 indexed citations
17.
Freeth, Della, et al.. (2001). ‘Real life’ clinical learning on an interprofessional training ward. Nurse Education Today. 21(5). 366–372. 54 indexed citations
18.
Freeth, Della. (2001). Sustaining interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 15(1). 37–46. 95 indexed citations
19.
Nicol, Maggie & Della Freeth. (1998). Assessment of clinical skills: a new approach to an old problem. Nurse Education Today. 18(8). 601–609. 84 indexed citations
20.
Freeth, Della, et al.. (1951). Value of External Cephalic Version under Anaesthesia. BMJ. 2(4736). 881–884. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026