Journal of Empirical Theology

341 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 341 papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (185 papers), Health (147 papers) and Education (120 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (147 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (112 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Empirical Theology are Leslie J. Francis, Dirk Hutsebaut, Andrew Village, Leslie P. Francis, Paul Vermeer, Friedrich Schweitzer, Mandy Robbins, Hans Schilderman, R.R. Ganzevoort and Carl Sterkens.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Empirical Theology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Empirical Theology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Empirical Theology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Empirical Theology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025