Spine Surgery and Related Research

450 papers and 2.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 450 papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research usually cover Surgery (358 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (289 papers) and Pharmacology (95 papers) specifically the topics of Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (275 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (185 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Spine Surgery and Related Research are Shigeru Hirabayashi, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Shuichi Mizuno, James D. Kang, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Seiji Ohtori, Masayuki Miyagi, Manabu Ito, Gen Inoue and Tetsuro Ohba.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Countries where authors publish in Spine Surgery and Related Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Spine Surgery and Related Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Spine Surgery and Related Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spine Surgery and Related Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025