Journal of Children and Poverty

266 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 266 papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty usually cover General Health Professions (100 papers), Sociology and Political Science (97 papers) and Education (77 papers) specifically the topics of Homelessness and Social Issues (80 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (46 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Children and Poverty are Emily Rosenbaum, Van C. Tran, Ruth Evans, Godwin S. Ashiabi, Sara Berry, Mark Nord, Robin L. Jarrett, William Elliott, Sondra G. Beverly and Heather Sandstrom.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Children and Poverty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Children and Poverty. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Children and Poverty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Children and Poverty more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025