Journal of Public Procurement

363 papers and 4.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 363 papers published in Journal of Public Procurement in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Public Procurement usually cover Strategy and Management (301 papers), Management Information Systems (117 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (114 papers) specifically the topics of Public Procurement and Policy (274 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (96 papers) and Construction Project Management and Performance (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Public Procurement are Khi V. Thai, Clifford P. McCue, Phoebe Bolton, M. Jae Moon, Eric Prier, Sue Arrowsmith, Alexandru V. Roman, Susan A. MacManus, Rene G. Rendon and David Seth Jones.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Public Procurement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Public Procurement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Public Procurement.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Public Procurement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Public Procurement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Public Procurement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Public Procurement more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025