Countries where authors publish in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology
This network shows the impact of papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology.
About American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology
The 605 papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations . Papers published in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology usually cover Biotechnology (54 papers), Food Science (75 papers) and Plant Science (132 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (28 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (26 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American journal of biochemistry & biotechnology are Ghaly, Aydin Berenjian, Yaning Zhang, Aishah Salleh, A.B.M. Sharif Hossain, Partha Pratim Chowdhury, Amru Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. E. Ghaly, Nisachon Jangpromma and Z.H.A. Rahim.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.