Journal of Asia Business Studies

531 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 531 papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies usually cover Strategy and Management (194 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (169 papers) and Accounting (130 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (107 papers), International Business and FDI (71 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Asia Business Studies are Najul Laskar, Jeevan Jyoti, Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol, Purba Rao, Shaista Wasiuzzaman, Muhammad Umar, Sangeeta Arora, Harsandaldeep Kaur, Kriti Priya Gupta and Utkarsh Goel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Asia Business Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Asia Business Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Asia Business Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Asia Business Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025