Avian Conservation and Ecology

520 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 520 papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology usually cover Ecology (445 papers), Global and Planetary Change (128 papers) and Ecological Modeling (125 papers) specifically the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (253 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (219 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (190 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Avian Conservation and Ecology are Erin M. Bayne, Julia Shonfield, Philip D. Taylor, Peter J. Blancher, Steven L. Van Wilgenburg, Jon D. McCracken, Keith A. Hobson, Craig S. Machtans, Silke Nebel and Philip Taylor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology.

Countries where authors publish in Avian Conservation and Ecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Avian Conservation and Ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Avian Conservation and Ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Avian Conservation and Ecology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025