Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

14.2k citations
1.4k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

1.1k papers receiving 12.6k citations

Peers

Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Biomedical Engineering 5.4k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.2k
  • Rehabilitation 661
  • Health Informatics 123
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.1k
Replace Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology with:
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology United Kingdom
Expert Review of Medical Devices United States
Journal of Healthcare Engineering China
International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery United States
Journal of Applied Biomedicine India
Computer Aided Surgery United States
Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering China
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express United States
Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology United Kingdom
Surgical Innovation United States
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering relative to Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology United Kingdom Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering.

About Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

The 1.4k papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering in the last decades have received a total of 14.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering usually cover Biomedical Engineering (456 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (219 papers), Rehabilitation (54 papers), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (34 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (150 papers) specifically the topics of EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (110 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (73 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (68 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (66 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (64 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (58 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (56 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering are Mu Chiao, Hongbin Zhang, Shan‐hui Hsu, Chengyu Liu, M. Murugappan, Ioannis D. Apostolopoulos, Shing-Hong Liu, Wen-Fu Ho, Tânia Pereira and J. M. R. Cardoso.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact