Computer Aided Surgery

938 papers and 19.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 938 papers published in Computer Aided Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 19.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Computer Aided Surgery usually cover Surgery (540 papers), Biomedical Engineering (323 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (193 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (165 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (143 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Aided Surgery are Kevin Cleary, Charles C. Nguyen, M. Sati, Cyril Boéri, Jean–Yves Jenny, John R. Adler, Martin J. Murphy, Mohan Bodduluri, Jocelyne Troccaz and Achim Schweikard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Aided Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Aided Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Computer Aided Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Aided Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Aided Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Aided Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025