Expert Review of Medical Devices

1.6k papers and 31.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices in the last decades have received a total of 31.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices usually cover Surgery (661 papers), Biomedical Engineering (343 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (338 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (119 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (96 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Expert Review of Medical Devices are Junmin Zhu, Roger Marchant, Yong Ahn, Ahmed El‐Ghannam, Aldo R. Boccaccını, Saadiq F. El‐Amin, Cato T. Laurencin, Yusuf Khan, Andreas Lendlein and Si‐Shen Feng.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices.

Countries where authors publish in Expert Review of Medical Devices

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Expert Review of Medical Devices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Expert Review of Medical Devices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Expert Review of Medical Devices more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025