Surgical Innovation

1.7k papers and 20.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Surgical Innovation in the last decades have received a total of 20.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Surgical Innovation usually cover Surgery (1.3k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (410 papers) and Oncology (274 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (319 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (250 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Surgical Innovation are B. Todd Heniford, E. Matt Ritter, Daniel J. Scott, Kent W. Kercher, A. Cuschieri, David R. Urbach, William S. Cobb, B. Todd Heniford, Lee L. Swanström and Michael J. Rosen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Surgical Innovation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Surgical Innovation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Surgical Innovation.

Countries where authors publish in Surgical Innovation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Surgical Innovation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Surgical Innovation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical Innovation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025