Helen Hardacre

128 total papers · 1.1k total citations
46 papers, 476 citations indexed

About

Helen Hardacre is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Hardacre has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 476 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cultural Studies, 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Helen Hardacre's work include Japanese History and Culture (32 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers). Helen Hardacre is often cited by papers focused on Japanese History and Culture (32 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (6 papers). Helen Hardacre collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Helen Hardacre's co-authors include Frank J. Schwartz, Adam L. Kern, Charles F. Keyes, Laurel Kendall, William Dean Kinzley, Robert J. Pekkanen, Kim D. Reimann, Frank J. Schwartz, Yutaka Tsujinaka and Andrew E. Barshay and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Forces, The American Historical Review and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

In The Last Decade

Helen Hardacre

42 papers receiving 316 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Helen Hardacre 325 195 95 46 38 46 476
Thomas R. H. Havens 294 0.9× 222 1.1× 65 0.7× 31 0.7× 30 0.8× 58 545
David K. Jordan 344 1.1× 113 0.6× 48 0.5× 92 2.0× 29 0.8× 37 500
Richard H. Minear 207 0.6× 134 0.7× 119 1.3× 32 0.7× 23 0.6× 54 478
Robert E. Hegel 340 1.0× 158 0.8× 64 0.7× 51 1.1× 31 0.8× 66 515
Joseph M. Kitagawa 271 0.8× 134 0.7× 92 1.0× 69 1.5× 130 3.4× 74 505
Michael Hanchard 388 1.2× 122 0.6× 121 1.3× 82 1.8× 37 1.0× 29 551
Micol Seigel 256 0.8× 67 0.3× 114 1.2× 60 1.3× 14 0.4× 26 414
Gage Averill 208 0.6× 134 0.7× 29 0.3× 52 1.1× 32 0.8× 26 493
David Grimsted 216 0.7× 58 0.3× 105 1.1× 60 1.3× 55 1.4× 39 538
John B. Boles 297 0.9× 70 0.4× 141 1.5× 113 2.5× 23 0.6× 53 549

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Hardacre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Hardacre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Hardacre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Hardacre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Hardacre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Hardacre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Hardacre. The network helps show where Helen Hardacre may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Hardacre

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Hardacre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Hardacre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Hardacre. Helen Hardacre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026