Infants & Young Children

About

The 964 papers published in Infants & Young Children in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Infants & Young Children usually cover Clinical Psychology (642 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (324 papers) and Education (255 papers) specifically the topics of Family and Disability Support Research (538 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (283 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (179 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Infants & Young Children are Winnie Dunn, Michael J. Guralnick, Christina Corsello, Deborah J. Fidler, Carl J. Dunst, Walter Gilliam, Barbara H. Fiese, Mary Spagnola, Brooke Ingersoll and Ann P. Turnbull.

In The Last Decade

Infants & Young Children

884 papers receiving 14.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Infants & Young Children

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Infants & Young Children. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Infants & Young Children with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Infants & Young Children more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Infants & Young Children

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Infants & Young Children. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Infants & Young Children.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026