Developmental Neurorehabilitation

882 papers and 13.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 882 papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (483 papers), Clinical Psychology (364 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (281 papers) specifically the topics of Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (350 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (314 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (251 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Developmental Neurorehabilitation are Johnny L. Matson, Michelle Ploughman, Russell Lang, Mandy Rispoli, Gary Bedell, Max Horovitz, Giulio E. Lancioni, Jill C. Fodstad, Mats Granlund and Mark F. O’Reilly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Developmental Neurorehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Developmental Neurorehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developmental Neurorehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025