Internet Policy Review

368 papers and 5.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 368 papers published in Internet Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Internet Policy Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (163 papers), Political Science and International Relations (81 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (75 papers) specifically the topics of Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (79 papers), Social Media and Politics (56 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internet Policy Review are Primavera De Filippi, David B. Nieborg, Thomas Poell, José van Dijck, Natali Helberger, Stefan Larsson, Balázs Bodó, Axel Bruns, Francesca Musiani and Robert Gorwa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Internet Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internet Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internet Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Internet Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internet Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internet Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internet Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025